As government contracting companies explore the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance their business development (BD) and proposal writing capabilities, one of the most important aspects to consider is security. AI can streamline processes, reduce human error, and enhance decision-making, but implementing these tools in a secure and compliant manner is crucial—especially when dealing with sensitive government data.
Security breaches or mishandled data can lead to severe consequences, ranging from lost contracts to legal ramifications. As companies increasingly integrate AI into their workflows, understanding and addressing the security considerations associated with AI tools is essential.
Let’s explore the key security concerns for government contractors considering AI implementations, focusing on how to safeguard sensitive information, maintain compliance, and mitigate risks.
In federal contracting, contractors frequently handle sensitive data, including Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), personally identifiable information (PII), and intellectual property. This data must be protected under strict federal regulations. Whether using AI for proposal development, data analysis, or market research, government contractors need to ensure that their chosen AI tools can handle sensitive data securely and comply with relevant regulations.
Many government contracts involve the use of CUI, which requires special handling to ensure security and confidentiality. AI tools that handle CUI must meet federal security standards, such as those outlined in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-171, which lays out security requirements for protecting CUI in non-federal systems.
When evaluating AI tools, contractors must ensure that these platforms can securely manage and process CUI. This involves encryption, access control, and data segmentation features that ensure only authorized personnel can access sensitive information. Contractors must also ensure that AI tools do not expose CUI to unnecessary risk by storing it in unprotected environments or transmitting it over insecure channels.
Government contractors must prioritize AI platforms that comply with federal security standards, such as NIST, Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP), and DFARS. These standards provide guidelines for the secure handling of government data and are crucial for maintaining compliance when implementing AI tools.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework is widely regarded as the gold standard for managing cybersecurity risks in the U.S. federal government. AI tools used in federal contracting should be NIST-compliant, meaning they adhere to best practices for identifying, protecting, detecting, responding to, and recovering from cyber threats. For contractors, NIST compliance offers assurance that the AI tool is robust enough to handle sensitive information in a secure manner.
AI tools that operate in cloud environments should be FedRAMP-authorized. FedRAMP ensures that cloud services used by federal agencies (and their contractors) meet strict security standards, including data encryption, continuous monitoring, and incident response. Contractors using AI tools in the cloud should only consider platforms that have attained FedRAMP certification to ensure secure cloud operations.
For contractors working with the Department of Defense (DoD), DFARS compliance is critical. The DFARS clause 252.204-7012 specifies safeguarding requirements and incident reporting for contractors handling CUI. Contractors should ensure that AI tools are DFARS-compliant to meet the stringent security standards required by the DoD.
AI tools rely on large datasets to function, which makes data privacy and protection a top concern. Contractors need to ensure that the AI platforms they implement can securely store, manage, and process sensitive data, particularly during the proposal development process, where large volumes of data are ingested and processed.
One of the key security features to look for in AI platforms is data encryption. Both data at rest (stored data) and data in transit (data being transmitted between systems) should be encrypted to prevent unauthorized access. Encryption ensures that even if sensitive data is intercepted or breached, it cannot be read or exploited.
Access control is another critical factor in data protection. Contractors must ensure that AI platforms offer role-based access control (RBAC), allowing only authorized users to access specific data based on their roles within the organization. For example, proposal managers might have access to certain documents, while capture managers and business development leads may require access to broader sets of information. Role-based access helps minimize the risk of internal data breaches by limiting who can view or modify sensitive data.
AI tools often require continuous data ingestion and analysis to deliver accurate outputs, such as proposal drafts or market research. It’s essential that AI platforms provide secure data storage solutions that comply with federal regulations. This includes maintaining data integrity during storage and using secure transmission protocols, such as Transport Layer Security (TLS), to protect data in transit.
Contractors should also assess whether AI tools offer features such as automatic data backups and secure cloud storage options that meet FedRAMP or NIST requirements. These features ensure that sensitive data is not only protected but also recoverable in the event of a cyberattack or system failure.
Even with the best security measures in place, cyberattacks and data breaches remain a possibility. For government contractors, having a clear plan for mitigating risks and responding to incidents is crucial.
When selecting an AI tool, contractors should assess the vendor’s incident response plan. How quickly can the vendor detect, respond to, and recover from a cyberattack? Are there mechanisms in place for contractors to receive notifications about potential breaches? Contractors should work with vendors that have well-documented, tested incident response plans that align with federal requirements.
Some AI platforms offer continuous monitoring features that detect unusual activity, such as unauthorized access attempts or anomalous data usage. Contractors should prioritize AI tools that offer these real-time monitoring capabilities, ensuring that potential security threats are identified and mitigated before they can cause damage.
For example, an AI platform might monitor login patterns and flag suspicious behavior, such as an unexpected login attempt from an unrecognized location. The system can then notify the contractor’s IT team, allowing them to take immediate action to prevent a potential security breach.
Beyond security concerns, contractors must also consider the ethical implications of using AI. AI bias, where algorithms favor certain outcomes or produce skewed results based on flawed training data, is a significant concern in government contracting. An AI platform that produces biased outputs could lead to legal challenges, lost contracts, and reputational damage.
To avoid bias, contractors must ensure that the data used to train their AI systems is accurate, representative, and unbiased. This involves regularly auditing data sets and updating the AI model to reflect current trends and regulatory changes. Many AI vendors now offer tools to monitor for bias and ensure that outputs are fair and non-discriminatory.
For federal contractors, where winning or losing a contract can depend on subtle differences in proposal responses, AI bias can be especially damaging. Contractors should work closely with their AI vendors to ensure data integrity and ethical AI usage.
When considering an AI tool, government contractors should ask their vendor several key questions to assess the platform’s security capabilities:
For contractors looking for a secure AI solution, Unanet ProposalAI offers a platform designed with security and compliance in mind. Unanet ProposalAI protects customer data through robust encryption and access controls, ensuring that sensitive information remains confidential. Importantly, Unanet ProposalAI does not use customer data for training its AI models, giving contractors peace of mind that their proprietary data remains private.
Want to see how it works? Schedule a consultation with one of our experts today.